First posted 9/8/13:
So I was thinking that Christiane Amanpour and Martha Raddick both of
ABC News (etc. for Amanpour) were the most reliable war journalists in
the U.S. today, was proud that women "had arrived" so to speak as half
the population of our nation (and the world). And then on CBS I heard an
ad boasting: "The Syrian crisis, we have Elizabeth Palmer and Clarissa
Ward." This begs the questions: Why are women
being sent as our lead foreign correspondents to war torn regions, when
they have to wear scarves or more and risk brutal attacks for driving,
walking alone on the street, etc.? I admire them, I loved reading
memoirs by NPR's Sarah Chayes (Punishment of virtue) and Anne Garrels
(Naked in Badhdad), and I am proud of my sisters taking the lead. But I
wonder about the white males sitting behind the anchors desks making the
big bucks many of whom have never gone overseas unless it was for the
Olympics or the Queen's Jubilee. This seems akin to a pattern that I
recognized some years ago in my own professional circles, that men were
being lifted up in ladder while women do more than their share of the
heavy lifting. What do you think. Please tell me if you think my
observations are bogus. Sometimes I see patterns where the behavior is
just random. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment